Saturday, January 30, 2010

Ikusa Otome Valkyrie Strean

Salzano (VE)

First race of 2010 on the trail ; challenge is the headquarters of the park Salzano (VE). The item "park", I was already assuming the usual yellow paper with white spots scattered on the ground and some relief. The departure and arrival from Milan early in the race area around 11 and snow fall just a few hours before it rendered monochrome the landscape and had jeopardized the event. The time to take a walk around the country at 13 you find yourself all at the sports ground adjacent to the park, the exterior view of the field is starting to understand that race will not exactly be a walk. I will not write the chronicle of my race, point by point, but to focus on a few things that impressed me. First, I am not of those who take issue with the ground, plotter, drawing paper, etc. ... This is not to say that too 'I have something to report (which I will later) but I decided to concentrate only on my mistakes and understand why I was wrong. In general, if Alessio T. made 3 errors means that he has understood the most points and then it's my fault if they are not even close! wrote down what I am going to analyze the path from my point of view: the first block is composed of 5 points in time. I must admit I have been good, because it does not immediately intuitive, but not impossible, my only doubt is on the 4th point, since the description of tree and vegetation limit "does not seem consistent with the guidelines IOF / FISO . If I remember correctly, the midpoint between two objects is halfway between the nearest part of the colon, in this case, the limit of vegetation extended in longitudinal direction and it became impossible to understand the ' alignment and point where to begin to estimate the distance. Personally, I have relied, erroneously, only on a circle, hoping to choosing exactly .... In this case, it is much more logical application of the 5 th point! The first two points of classic competition I have been fatal for one simple reason: I could not figure out where exactly was the center of the circle! Unfortunately, I noticed the stamp on paper only running from a point 7. In fact, both the saddle between the group of trees that had been laid many lanterns very tight, not understanding the exact alignments I completely wrong answers. Point 3, the rifacessi 100 times it's always wrong! the most obvious answer would be .... Z all three lanterns were not laid on top of 'availment (with single line! attention ...) but very close to the change of the slope. Although he has talked with Guido M., before the start of the question noses / depressions with single level curve still have not found consistency to review! Sections 4 and 5 were very special because of the ability needed long-distance observation, my mistake at the fifth left me puzzled but it could be that, here, I was deficient in the trial. Point 6, I did not justifications : I do not say it was installed wrong (the end of a path can not go wrong) but that we must give the possibility to participants, to judge honestly .... here, elements that can be used in the choice, I have not noticed. Point 7, had two very close and paper lanterns I could not understand what information might exclude me the wrong one to be honest, I wrong here anyway because I had not noticed the lantern placed on the Section 8 .... Point 10 has made many victims: I am saved because had observed the area from step 3 and then, when the choice is not returning me the positions I had previously stored! Has anyone had problems but at 12, the auxiliary curve was very helpful for the choice. The block 13-14 has required a lot of patience and study: the path on the ridge was invisible (due to snow) and the lantern high (13) deceived the view by assuming it was very accurate. Here I missed the 13, 14 and the right choice but I have punched the wrong (now I understand that in this sport more attention should be paid towards your punch!). The points 15 and 16 were Tutt 'other: land new flat, clean, with other issues ... personally I was fine but I know that many people find wrong with the mound of the number 16. Of 17, I do not know what to say because I fired (50% probability) After a quick look ... so fast that I came with 10 "ahead of the expiration of the time and without the running! (point earned). After this virtual tour on the way, I can say that my budget is very poor: it is true that I have two punches incorrect (the 8 is F, but on my receipt is A, and 14) but I gained a point (the 17) and I was saved on time without knowing it. This is not what matters to me: I worry more errors Initial (after eight lanterns had only one correct answer) and especially the difficulty of understanding the ground Dov 'dirt is moved and the woods. Perhaps it is precisely with this type of racing that I can improve because it is not the ranking that interests me, but the desire to improve on a few land "Nordic" we have mapped for trail.
I invite you to go to Troilus. it regarding results, map and photos.

0 comments:

Post a Comment