Benefits Of Ht Ddw 7500

Forlanini a

After the post sentimental, that's what more technical.

Some things have already been anticipated in the solutions commented that I had compiled before the race, I was curious to see if, on the plotter, I figured out how the race would have evolved.

left in the background issues relating to weather, light, vegetation, however, that would affect the race, making it more or less difficult to analyze the individual wanted in the light of lanterns res ultati that, ultimately, are more of words.

My idea of \u200b\u200ba path provided for a lackluster first half with enough of the questions simple enough, after the Section 7, the long walk leads to the second part where he turns to other questions demanding simple.

The number of stars, comment on the solutions listed, indicate how long it would take, in my opinion, to resolve the point.

The first time was not structured to make huge selection : approaching the area glimpsed some towels and someone tried to study in advance the area.

This type of question presented a list of trees uniform blocks that made the sight before my eyes, my goal was to make clear the C-response as the lanterns on either side seemed too far away from the rim. In reality, the strategy was qu she understand what was the tree that stood in front of the observation point, which is the watershed between the lanterns (A, B, C) and the other two, and only then Now you might be able to correctly decipher the entire sequence of trees and respond properly.

Ben 15 athletes have answered correctly, all the best except that Marina did not appear to be in its best day.

The second point in time had to be that he was s c election, in fact, the area is the same but seen from the west. To avoid that during the journey, first to second point in time, someone stopped to study the area, should be laid Stegal ave de lle lanterns "owl" to divert attention from the first point.

The difficulty arose from the fact that the white (willows) hid in the bush to the west, which is why those who have tried to mentally reconstruct the area from left to right could not cope with them. Note that the bush is hidden beneath the contour line and the two bushes in the foreground were the same height, and my idea was to give the impression that the correct answer was D, as laid visible on the second bush.

Another element of concern was the trees (red) in the background: the lantern C was the same as the first point (B) and then the nearest tree to the lake when, in fact, if the bush down other trees were also visible "red" should have been seen.

Only three athletes have passed this exam, but two are the best and the other is Lenarduzzi that can pass from answers to impossible blunders; Tenan responded and rroneamente except after notice .... Cereser lost here to win!

After two points in time begins the race with a very simple question: individ uare if a lantern is or is not at a given point.

Here there were several signs to arrive with certainty in the result, firstly, the circle's center is located south-west end of the path, it is true that we do not see the word, but we see the direction and the lantern is on the right (seeing from the point of view).

To determine if the horizontal alignment is correct you should marry legs to the east and north edge of the sight of the cabin with the angle of the fence, watch, since the two objects are not parallel to the loudspeaker RNA can lie on the the edge of the cabin but outside (north) with respect to it or .

Ben 6 athletes wrong perhaps through inexperience, but I think Susy and Julia M. could be up to solve it.

The second point is the classic point of the trail: the level curve which shows a single dip. I was wrong many times this point because I'm not totally agree with the convention of the Trail; fact, the Convention provides that in case of hollows and noses, delineated by a single curve, it should be considered only a part and morphological appearance of.

This means that in the event of a depression in the curve llo goes live in mid-slope, the part to be considered valid treasuries and that is just low.

I said that I disagree with this rule because I think that the curve only serves to highlight, on paper, at that point there but then the depression should be the ground for rmi shows the start and end that kind of morphology.

Assuming that this convention is unlikely to be changed to address these points I learned the classic trail, in the case of the Forlanini A lantern was placed at about half dell'avvallamento real but still above the curve level drawn on paper that passed the height of the rock; B lantern, which was actually placed in the flat part dell'avvalamento was the one that meets the convention.

This was wrong by six people but I was surprised by the errors experienced athletes like Lenarduzzi, and Beltramo Falda!

The third control consisted of a series of rocks at the edge of which go, the farther east, was not mapped in the minority compared to others.

And it was this lack that we played the answer: D was placed on the stone lantern "ghost" while B and C were mapped to the east of the two stones.

The other disturbing factor was the presence of the lantern, outside the group, that had it not been mentioned would "bust" the answer.

Almost everyone has understood the question as though surprised Grilli has opted to Z by noting that the lantern, for logistic reasons (the lake had reached the foot of the rock), was placed behind the stone, leaving some cm to the east, Marina, confirming his departure negative, wrong again, but I think Robert has forgotten the lantern A.

The fourth point, which was annulled due to the fall of a towel duran you the competition, it was tricky because, although it was impossible to identify the paved ground, had more elements of the resolution.

The first option was termination calculate the distance between the lanterns and the road, there were more than 5 feet difference, which covers a distance of 15 meters is quite noticeable.

Other help came from the white spot above the tree, the lanterns were sitting in the center and the edge of this spot by the lantern out what was correct.

Before the cancellation I had noticed that almost all the athletes had responded correctly.

Fifthly, on paper, as trivial the steps could be seen clearly, I knew that in November the vegetation would have been different and the scale would be covered with leaves. Looking at the hill and the location of the benches you could tell what was the exact lantern.

Looking back now, perhaps, does not call the same point since technically there were no references to exploit big but just a little bit of insight and logic. Things to avoid .... However, only

Marina made a mistake here and four other athletes with little experience.

The sixth point was not random but must be understood to obtain the necessary information changing points of view. I state that the hole was indeed invisible from the street and then I would never put a Z with supporting the installation to the edge or the like, on paper there were three holes and it was important to understand where they were placed on the ground.

From the area near the fountain you could do the azimuth already indicated a very specific slice of space, from the intersection of the streets you could see the alignment of three hypothetical holes. But it was from the south, behind the stain green triangle that had made the correct perception that the cloth was placed east of the green tip.

Nine athletes have this wrong lantern, two excellent victims: Tenan and Cereser.

Alex told me that he always thought In response but had changed his mind just watching from the south, really weird .... Elvira, I have not heard but maybe comment on this post.

The seven point was designed to recover time to those who had spent too much previously, a long channel, with two curve in the road, and a white to highlight its location.

The lanterns were sitting near the corners and the middle between the two, Remus, found this more difficult than others, I do not know if he was tired or because the question was complicated, and I think most of the first hypothesis because only three athletes have this wrong. After

the long walk, in which one could also study the paragraph 18, you get to step 8, this group of lanterns (the only 5-sheets) was built to make some selection.

Here the difficulty was to mentally draw the entire sequence of white and yellow that extended from the point of view almost all 'work of art (?), It was important to rely on the only white on the left of the road indicating the depth of the two lanterns are closer to the rim.

The sheets D and E were to be discarded almost immediately as being too close to the point of view and the first big yellow as well away from the road, the lantern was placed in the yellow but right on the edge of the white spots that surround it. B and C remained, but moving to the north you could see that the C was beyond the yellow spot inside the circle.

I have noticed that this point has dropped to less experienced but Lenarduzzi Grilli and have opted for different answers.

The nine point because he could become tricky, however, too many details to be observed, was to focus first and foremost as a set of three trees were on the north-south.

The lantern was placed on triples and then it was clear that that the terno was just two lines to the east, another method could be to align the internal shaft of trees with various themes and see if they continue to fall across the road on the yellow or white; the terno was the first exact which was continued in the yellow.

Only four athletes have been wrong but you may not notice, again, the combination Grilli - Lenarduzzi that from that moment began their comeback.

point ten was not the original one as it has been recently added; dovendolo invent in that area, I opted for a question of accuracy but it became quite simple having a tree as a reference.

In fact, I believe that very few would be able to see the median between the channel and the fence without the aid of the trees. All I did was put both lanterns on the same axis but with different depths.

The difficulty was figuring out which of the lantern had been placed in the south west of the tree at a distance of about 3-4 meters.

This question was wrong by six people but note that there are all three athletes in Turin ....

Point eleven, seen on the map, might seem complicated, as seen from a distance three holes in the middle of a field, could be complicated.

In this case it was necessary to locate the hole center and observe the western edge (otherwise the risk was that the cloth could be seen not just ...); the viewing angle was quite large and, indeed, could be observed the point raised by a prospect.

At least three were the chances of detection of the exact hole: the electric wire, which passed directly over the pit to the south, the distance between lantern and white spot on the south should have been more or sighting trees located near the road with the two poplars planted close to the channel north of the holes. Who had a good view could also identify the three (actually four) holes.

So many were the chances that no one (almost) made a mistake.

Point twelve had a question related to the position of a contour from observing it, in fact, the problem was figuring out where the hill ended because there was a possibility that the two lanterns were to be included in the design of the hill .

This time I wanted to exclude the lantern to B but not to exacerbate the problems would go quietly variant of the two lanterns with same description. My problem was to make sure that we understood so I was wondering what the circle centered close to the edge of the road.

C The lantern was placed about 5 meters from the center of the road and about 10 meters north of the vertical channel, the B lantern was 4 meters, south east from the lantern C.

With these small distances and the way through, I never thought about the lantern Z, and now I do not know if I made a mistake not to consider this option in view of the practical results.

In fact, almost everyone understands the problem but the most finicky (Madella, Tenan, Bettin) gave the answer that Z was not in my predictions, I wonder if I have been superficial or too clear them ....

thirteen point was very simple and was used to save time in anticipation of the next two questions. The first two sheets were laid in order to look correct, the lantern was in the right area but not at the edge of the vegetation and the lantern point B satisfy the description but not the center of the circle.

Here, only Paolo Grassi and certainly wrong for ignoring the rules.

fourteen point was designed to make selection even though I tried to give a little help with the lantern C. In fact, the big problem was to understand the depth of the sheeting over the wood and the fence.

C The lantern was placed about 3 meters from the fence, so its distance was correct, but his position was significantly shifted to the south.

contrast, the D lamp was properly aligned with the continuation of the east-west road, but 14 meters far from the fence, a possible solution was to combine these two pieces of information.

Another possibility was to align the two lanterns and see that the line originated from them came near the fence north of the observation point.

Most of the best managed to do well here and the only Guido illustrious victim was here that he lost the challenge with Remo.

The fifteen point appeared quite tricky, there was no visual reference of the wall and then you could not solve by conventional methods.

The center of the circle indicates the distance between the 'hypothetical lantern is correct that the fence from the road, in particular, the wall covered the 2 / 3 (about 22 meters) away and the whole then the lantern would be placed about 11 meters south of the fence.

Instead, the cloth and was placed approximately midway between the fence and street corner and then some 16 meters.

The correct way to solve this problem was to create an axis parallel to the road point of view, trying to figure, with the distance, the distances mentioned above.

In this question, we have distinguished those who have experience in this sport as they fall to the eye the two blocks of those who have heart or not.

The sixteen point seemed easy, must have been difficult but has been easy, I mean: put two lanterns on two corners of a fence is stuff for beginners.

The point I had chosen because, in reality, the angle chosen not seen at all, this summer, the area extending from sheet B to the lonely tree was all green uniform 3.

For this, I had carefully mapped the lengths of the networks and emphasized the channel running along the private land.

Unfortunately, heavy rains have taken away some of this green, leaving a glimpse of the building inside the fence and then making it very easy to this point.

In reading the results I was amazed by the response (A) M. Giuliano!

penultimate point is not an easy one, was the classic question "between the two," but with a twist: the axis that connected the two points was not flat and not fully visible.

I did not want to cheat on the alignment because I wanted to test the athlete's skill in this technique, I wanted to see, even if someone does not know the rule of the edges ....

The solution to this point could be similar to that of the fifteen point: to extend the axis of the path on the road near the point of view and count about 9 / 10 steps that separated from the edge of the road east of the brook, at which point do half and realize that the fabric B was the correct one.

The majority of participants did well even if the answer surprises me Fulvio and Susy.

last point quite simply because I did not embarrass those who were late, and the distance from the lantern was a lot earlier but it was already studying the position of the trees.

The three lanterns were sitting in a rather schematic (the median axis of each tree in the south against a single vertex) is not a major problem.

In fact, no competitor has had problems.

Time to draw breath for a moment and then off to the final points in time, the third point in time was prepared to make the selection.

I used one of the few areas where the contour lines to try to vary the questions, even in this control I wanted to make sure that the instinctive response was wrong.

I chose to put two lanterns in yellow on the chart is pretty obvious, in fact, only the cloth C seemed to be in the meadow while D and E, is sufficiently far away and hidden in the woods.

In fact, the solution had to be sought by observing the curve of the support level that if you call in this way, a pure function must have it!

In this case, was used to delineate the end of this level between the two contours continue, looking towards the southwest understood the concept just expressed, because the assistant spent over two isolated trees.

C The lantern was instead placed at the two isolated trees and therefore too low.

Only seven competitors have responded exactly but should be underlined and Padoan Cortellazzi tests that are not the most experienced.

's last point in time had not been thought of as too difficult and too open to newcomers were called to speak, and when I looked at the participants' responses are amazed! I did not think he could make that selection.

It was a very simple question, where there were no branches or particular obstacles: five shots (standing trees) are willing to harness and five lanterns perched on some medians.

I think he cheated because they have placed four sheets close together in a very similar mindset as to the correct one.

Who has had the ability to analyze the scenario had no problems while respondents of force has paid the duty.

In nine, including open A and newcomers, have made well while others have realized that the trail is not really a triviality.

I apologize to the open to newcomers and if I do this job for them but if someone wanted to have clarification on their points are available.

With this I believe I have done everything that tied me to this race as a cartographer, plotter, computer, etc. ... hoping that the race enjoyed.

Also because I do not know if and when there will be a ba!